- Fundamentals
- Posts
- 💼 Negotiating Co-GP Deals, Part 5
💼 Negotiating Co-GP Deals, Part 5
Who makes the decisions?

🎉 Happy Friday, funds family!
This is the fifth in a multi-part series on 💼 Negotiating Co-GP Deals. This week, we’re going to discuss how co-GPs share management authority.
But first…
/ SELF PROMOTION

If you’re a sponsor (GP) raising an investment fund or syndication in private equity, private credit, real estate, or venture capital, we may be a good fit for you. We also represent limited partners (LPs) investing in funds and syndications.
Thanks for reading. Now, let’s jump into the article 😃
🤔 The First Question: Member-Managed vs. Manager-Managed
When determining the management structure for a co-GP vehicle (or really…any LLC), the first question is whether the entity should be member-managed or manager-managed.
Member-managed entities generally permit all members to vote, and a majority (or some other percentage) of “yes” votes is required to make decisions.
Manager-managed entities appoint a day-to-day manager (who might also be a member) to shoulder most management duties.
If the two parties are truly equal and both want to get their hands dirty, they might opt for a member-managed structure. On the other hand, if the capital provider’s principal job is really only to provide money, they might agree to a manager-managed structure with the operator taking charge of day-to-day tasks.
✅ Major Decision Rights
In many cases, the co-GP agreement will have a list of major decisions that require a special vote. In a member-managed LLC, a supermajority vote might be necessary. In a manager-managed agreement, major decisions may require the consent of the non-managing member.
Common major decisions include:
Amending the LLC agreement
Admitting new members or diluting existing members
Permitting transfers of interests
Expenditures or litigation settlements above a certain dollar value
Shutting down the co-GP or the underlying fund
Material decisions related to the underlying fund’s investments (e.g., buying, selling, refinancing)
Many other things (these lists can be long)
💰️ Investment Committees
Many GP-level agreements establish a formal investment committee. Key terms include:
Composition: Operator appointees versus capital provider appointees, often weighted toward the operator but with minority representation for the capital provider.
Voting thresholds: Investment committees often require a majority of votes to make investments, but agreements differ.
Veto rights: Capital providers may negotiate a negative consent right on specified investments, concentration limits, or deviations from the agreed strategy.
In some funds, GPs bring on external investment committee members, who may be compensated for their work (either with cash or carried interest).
👨👩👦👦 The Advisory Committee
Capital providers often negotiate the right to designate a representative to the fund’s LP advisory committee (LPAC) or other fund-level boards. This ensures visibility into conflicts, valuation, and compliance. The LPAC is basically a group of LPs that grants the GP permission to take certain actions under the fund’s LPA.
/ WRAPPING THE CASE
![]() |
|
Thanks for reading, everyone.
Have a great weekend! 🙌
/ JURY TRIAL
How did you like today's post? |
Have you enjoyed this newsletter? Don’t forget to share it with your GP, Co-GP, LPs, or anyone else you think might find it valuable!
You can also propose a topic that you would like us to cover! Just reply to this email or submit your suggestions 🔗 here.
⚠️ Note: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and nothing should be considered legal advice. For that, hire a lawyer! I am a lawyer, but not your lawyer (unless I actually am your lawyer because you’ve signed an engagement letter and we’re working together). This newsletter may be considered attorney advertising.
Reply