- Fundamentals
- Posts
- š¼ Negotiating Co-GP Deals, Part 2
š¼ Negotiating Co-GP Deals, Part 2
How to structure the capital partner's capital commitment

š Happy Friday, funds family!
This is the second in a multi-part series on š¼ Negotiating Co-GP Deals. This week, weāre going to discuss the capital providerās commitment to the underlying investment fund or syndication.
But firstā¦
/ SELF PROMOTION

If youāre a sponsor (GP) raising an investment fund or syndication in private equity, private credit, real estate, or venture capital, we may be a good fit for you. We also represent limited partners (LPs) investing in funds and syndications.
Thanks for reading, now letās jump into the article š
š¤ Do all co-GPs commit capital to the underlying investment fund?
While not all co-GPs (ācapital providerā or āanchorā) commit capital to the underlying investment fund or syndication, itās very common. However, the range can vary widely. Some capital providers might commit as little as 5% of the total fund size, while others might constitute half of the committed capital. Every deal is different.
Note that the exact structure of the capital commitment also varies. In some cases, the capital provider will route its capital through the GP entity into the fund. In other words, the capital provider has a commitment to the GP, which in turn has a commitment to the fund. In these cases, the applicable commitment is ~always on a fee-free, carry-free basis.
In other cases, the capital provider might make some or all of its investment as a limited partner in the underlying fund. In these cases, the capital provider will typically have a side letter granting it special terms in respect of its LP interest. Otherwise, the anchor will be subject to management fees and carried interest just like any other LP.
š§µ Commitments with strings attached
In some cases, the capital providerās commitment might be conditional upon the fund reaching a certain size. For example, the anchorās investment might be $50 million; provided the fund raises at least an additional $50 million.
A related concept is the āratchetingā commitment. The capital providerās commitment might be the lesser of $10 million or 25% of the fund size, with a floor of $2 million.
In general, at least part of the commitment is typically effective as of the fundās š ļø Initial Closing Date.
People get quite creative with this.
š What goes in the capital providerās side letter?
In general, the side letter provisions that a capital provider in a co-GP relationship might request are similar to any other anchor investor. You can check out a list of typical side letter provisions in this article: š ļø "Side Letters" in Funds and Syndications
Hereās a list of some of the most common provisions:
Most favored nations (MFN): The anchor investor gets the right to take special side letter rights granted to other LPs (subject to some exceptions).
Fee/carry waivers: The anchorās investment might get waived (or reduced) carried interest and/or management fees.
Co-investment rights: The anchor might get a preferential right to co-invest alongside the fund, often on a fee-free/carry-free basis.
LPAC: The anchor investor often gets the right to appoint a member to the fundās limited partner advisory committee.
These side letters can range from very simple (1-2 pages) to seriously complex (30+ pages).
/ WRAPPING THE CASE
![]() |
|
Thanks for reading, everyone.
Have a great weekend! š
/ JURY TRIAL
How did you like today's post? |
Have you enjoyed this newsletter? Donāt forget to share it with your GP, Co-GP, LPs, or anyone else you think might find it valuable!
You can also propose a topic that you would like us to cover! Just reply to this email or submit your suggestions š here.
ā ļø Note: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and nothing should be considered legal advice. For that, hire a lawyer! I am a lawyer, but not your lawyer (unless I actually am your lawyer because youāve signed an engagement letter and weāre working together). This newsletter may be considered attorney advertising.
Reply